Il tuo browser non supporta JavaScript!

When the Wrong Kind of Authority Neutralizes Journalism: Cold War Enmity, Journalism and the US Presidential Race

digital When the Wrong Kind of Authority Neutralizes Journalism:
Cold War Enmity, Journalism and the US Presidential Race
Articolo
rivista COMUNICAZIONI SOCIALI
fascicolo COMUNICAZIONI SOCIALI - 2018 - 1. POWER, MULTIDIRECTIONALITY AND CONTINGENCY Political Struggles over Representation, Decision-Making and Technology
titolo When the Wrong Kind of Authority Neutralizes Journalism: Cold War Enmity, Journalism and the US Presidential Race
autore
editore Vita e Pensiero
formato Articolo | Pdf
online da 31-01-2018
doi 10.26350/001200_000002
issn 03928667 (stampa) | 18277969 (digitale)
Scrivi un commento per questo prodotto
Scarica

Ebook in formato Pdf leggibile su questi device:

This paper addresses how Cold War enmity helped undermine US journalistic coverage of the 2016 presidential race. When the Cold War ended in 1989, its mindset went underground, surfacing periodically to lend form to events and issues in need of public consensus. One of its contours involved longstanding patterns of enemy formation, which years later offered journalists a familiar way of framing the 2016 presidential race. Far from useful, however, these patterns played to enmity short-circuited journalism’s response to changes in contemporary political culture, suggesting that journalists invoked the wrong kind of authority to cover Donald Trump’s struggle in the presidential elections. Not only did this power dynamics forcefully constrain journalists’ ability to provide fuller coverage, but it displayed an adherence to the past that neutralized the development of alternative modes of journalistic conduct that might have been more responsive to what ensued.

keywords

Journalism; enmity; US presidential race; Cold War; Trump.

Ultimo fascicolo

Anno: 2018 - n. 1

Newsletter CS

* campi obbligatori
Academia.edu